Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Three cheers for the party of ‘no’”
February 9, 2010 at 2:13 pm | In Published Columns 2010, U.S. Politics | Leave a CommentTags: Lebanon Democrat Columns
Not long after his recent State of the Union speech, President Obama chastised the GOP as the party of “no” and demanded, “I want the Republicans off the sidelines. I want them to work with us to solve problems. I don’t want an attitude ‘If Obama loses, then we win.’ I mean, that can’t be a platform. … All of us should be rooting for each other.”
Days later, President Obama got even testier. He chastised Republicans for opposing him on health care, economic stimulus, and other major issues, and once again complained that a GOP-driven “politics of no” was blocking action on bills that could help Americans obtain jobs and health care.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Democrats currently hold a 256-178 majority in the House of Representatives and a 59-41 majority in the Senate. Before the seating of Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) last Thursday, the GOP simply didn’t have the votes to block much of anything. So blaming the GOP for blocking Obama’s agenda is simply passing the buck. Believe me, I wish the GOP could take credit for the failures of the Obama administration, but the buck stops with Obama.
At any rate, isn’t it a bit ironic for President Obama to demand that Republicans cross the aisle to help enact his agenda? How many times did Senator Obama cross the aisle to help President Bush enact his agenda?
President Obama rode into office on the lofty platitudes of hope and change. He was the post-partisan, post-racial candidate who was going to get the world to like us again, end the partisan bickering in Washington, heal our broken souls, and lower the sea levels. But the truth is, not only has the Great Unifier failed to unite the country, he can’t even unite his own party.
President Obama’s signature legislation, ObamaCare, is on life support after Scott Brown’s stunning victory last month in Massachusetts ended the Democrats’ year-old filibuster-proof majority in the Senate. The Congress had every opportunity to enact ObamaCare. The House passed its own version last fall, one that contained a public option. In the Senate, though, Harry Reid couldn’t get 60 senators to support a public option, so the Senate passed its own bill without a public option. Nancy Pelosi has already stated that she doesn’t have the votes in the House to pass the Senate’s bill, and the Senate doesn’t have the votes to break a filibuster anymore, so, despite the brave faces they wear in public, the Democrats are in complete disarray.
So President Obama’s demand that Republicans sell out their own values and ideas and take up his mantra is rooted in two realities.
First, he can’t unite his own party, so President Obama would need to peel off a few Republican votes here and there to pass his agenda.
But there’s also a second reason. President Obama and the Democrats are working directly against the sentiments of the American people. Most of us don’t want what they’re offering. As evidenced by recent GOP victories in three states that Obama won in 2008 (Virginia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts), the voters are rejecting liberalism.
By continuing to pursue ObamaCare, Democrats have shown they don’t care what we think. They can read the polls. They know they’re setting themselves up for a drubbing come November. They got a pre-taste of that just last month. So President Obama wants the GOP to join him in order that both parties share the blame, and not just the Democrats. In other words, President Obama is demanding that the GOP jump onto his own sinking ship, and he’s trying to goad Republicans by calling them the party of “no,” as though saying “no” to the Democrats’ disastrous legislative agenda is a bad thing.
The U.S. has the greatest health care system in the world. Democrats want to destroy it by having the federal government take over and run the health care industry. To that, we Republicans say “no.” We don’t accept the premise that we need health care reform.
Global warming is a hoax designed to give government an excuse to raise taxes and diminish our economic freedom and individual liberties. Cap-and-trade is based on the global warming hoax. To that, we Republicans say “no.” We don’t accept the premise that passing legislation, growing government, and raising taxes can change the weather.
We are in the worst recession since Jimmy Carter. There only two things government can do to help ease a recession: cut taxes and get government out of the way of the private sector. President Obama and the Democrats are doing the opposite. They have meddled incessantly with the private sector: banks, insurance companies, the automobile industry, the mortgage industry, Wall Street, etc. They have passed bills designed to stimulate the economy, so they say, but in reality have represented nothing more than huge government spending sprees. And they want to raise taxes on top of all that. To that, we Republicans say “no.” We don’t accept the premise that massive government spending of borrowed money improves the economy — quite the opposite, in fact.
So President Obama can grandstand and shift blame to the minority party all he wants, but his failures are all his own. The voters see what’s going on in Washington, and, in a smattering of off-year elections, they’ve already tossed out Democrats in states where Democrats have traditionally done well. The GOP would be wise to continue to articulate conservatism, step aside, and let the Democrats jump off the cliff by themselves.
Global warming hoax continues to unravel
February 8, 2010 at 6:01 pm | In Global Warming | Leave a CommentSweetness & Light has catalogued even more errors found in the Nobel-winning IPCC’s 2007 report. But, of course, this does nothing to discredit the rock-solid science behind global warming.
Still More ‘Errors’ In IPCC’s 2007 Report | Sweetness & Light
By the numbers
February 8, 2010 at 5:42 pm | In Media, Sports | Leave a CommentNot only did the Saints win the Super Bowl, they did so in front of the biggest TV audience in history.
The New Orleans Saints’ victory over Indianapolis in the Super Bowl was watched by more than 106 million people, surpassing the 1983 finale of “M-A-S-H” to become the most-watched program in U.S. television history, the Nielsen Co. said Monday.
Celebrate family, celebrate life
February 7, 2010 at 11:27 pm | In Abortion | Leave a CommentOkay, here’s the Tim Tebow Super Bowl commercial that had the pro-abortionists all worked up.
The Saints go marching
February 7, 2010 at 11:22 pm | In Sports | Leave a CommentCongratulations to the New Orleans Saints for winning their first Super Bowl, a 31-17 victory over the Indianapolis Colts. A few observations:
1. It looked like the Colts were going to dominate the game early, as Indianapolis raced out to a 10-0 first-quarter lead. From that point on, however, the Saints would outscore the Colts 31-7, including a 25-7 lopsided second half.
2. The Colts had the chance to hammer in a few more nails after a goal-line stand late in the first half from which the Saints came away with zero points. But the Colts promptly went three-and-out, and left the door open for a Saints’ field goal that made it 10-6 going into halftime. It was then you could feel the momentum begin to shift.
3. The Who absolutely cannot sing anymore. Great musicians, but don’t need to be anywhere near a microphone.
4. The Saints’ call for an onside kick to start the second half was insane. It also worked, and resulted in a touchdown drive for the Saints that put them in the lead 13-10. It turned out to be a game-changing play, and may very well become part of Super Bowl lore years from now.
5. The Colts actually had the lead until just under six minutes to play, when the Saints went ahead 24-17 on a touchdown and two-point conversion.
6. The game was very well-played, with very few penalties and no turnovers until…
7. As the second half wore on with the lead changing hands three times, it became a test of wills. Who would blink first? Peyton Manning or Drew Brees. It turned out to be Peyton Manning, whose late fourth-quarter interception with a little over three minutes left was run back for a touchdown that effectively shut the door on the Saints first-ever Super Bowl victory.
8. With Mardi Gras coming up, watch for Saints fans to burn down New Orleans in celebration. George W. Bush will be blamed for the destruction.
UPDATE: I see that USAGI beat me to the keyboard. Fortunately, we hashed out ownership rights to the quote in front of several witnesses before either of us had a chance to blog it.
You can’t say enough good things about honest friends.
Thank you, Audi
February 7, 2010 at 9:26 pm | In Global Warming | Leave a CommentI’ll have a lot more to say about the Super Bowl a little later. But first, I want to thank Audi for their Super Bowl commercial showing us exactly where the global warming leftists want to take us. At first, I thought this was a satire piece warning us where the global warming hoax will eventually lead, but this was not satire. Really, I appreciate their honesty.
Free throws sink Memphis
February 6, 2010 at 5:34 pm | In Sports | Leave a CommentTags: Tigers
The Memphis Tigers had a good showing at home against Gonzaga, ultimately losing 66-58. Memphis trailed most of the game, but briefly took the lead in the closing minutes. In the end, though, the Tigers’ inability to convert free throws cost them the game. So Memphis drops to 16-7, and will now have to win the C-USA tournament in order to make it to the Big Dance for a 5th straight year.
Mainstream press falls for Limbaugh’s trick again
February 5, 2010 at 11:18 pm | In Media | Leave a CommentBack in August, Rahm Emanuel, President Obama’s Chief-of-Staff, insulted retarded people (his word, not mine) by comparing them to liberal activists. The comment drew nary a blip from the mainstream press, until Sarah Palin called him on it. So Rush Limbaugh, on Wednesday’s show, pulled one of his “media tweaks” by quoting Emanuel. Now the media are outraged — not at Emanuel, but at Limbaugh — and are attempting to pit Palin against Limbaugh.
Once again, the gullible media have fallen for Limbaugh’s trick. They just never learn. No wonder the Maha Rushie has so much fun doing what he does.
Palin’s campaign against the “R-word” hits snag with Limbaugh – Yahoo! News
Don’t do it
February 5, 2010 at 8:48 am | In Sports | Leave a CommentIf the NFL players go on strike in 2011, they won’t find much sympathy with the fans. It would be at least as bad as the fallout from the baseball strike of 1994. Attendance suffered until the Summer of Steroids in 1998, when the fans finally came back. We’ve got unemployment close to 10%, and even if the economy is in recovery by next season, times will still be tough for a lot of Americans. If these blowhards aren’t willing to play, then fine, let the stadiums sit empty. And don’t ever bother coming back.
The question to DeMaurice Smith was simple, coming from Cincinnati receiver Chad Ochocinco, asking how serious he viewed the possibility of football not being played in 2011.
Smith did not hesitate.
“On a scale of 1 to 10,” Smith said Thursday, “it’s a 14.”
With that, the executive director of the NFL Players Association painted perhaps the bleakest picture yet regarding prospects of labor strife in the league, which could be looking at a 2010 season with no salary cap and, if the collective bargaining agreement expires as scheduled in March 2011, a lockout that year.
“I keep coming back to an economic model in America that is unparalleled,” said Smith, who often repeated phrases for emphasis. “And that makes it incredibly difficult to then come to players and say, on average, each of you needs to take a $340,000 pay cut to save the National Football League. Tough sell. Tough sell.”
NFL union leader paints bleak picture of future – Yahoo! News
The sad story of Centralia, Pennsylvania
February 5, 2010 at 8:32 am | In Human Interest | Leave a CommentWow, this is just a fascinating story. Centralia, PA used to be a coal-mining town. Back in 1962, a fire began in a coal vein underneath the town that burns to this day without showing any signs of burning out. As a result, the government used imminent domain laws to buy up the town, move the people out, and raze the buildings. There are fewer than a dozen residents left who stubbornly refuse to move.
Few remain as 1962 Pa. coal town fire still burns – Yahoo! News
Secret agent man
February 5, 2010 at 8:14 am | In Government, Human Interest | Leave a CommentThe Washington Post ran an unusual article back on Tuesday about the children of deceased CIA agents and their quest to find out about the work of their parents. Stuff I’ve never thought about until now.
The Obama recession about to get worse
February 5, 2010 at 8:14 am | In Economics | Leave a CommentThe AP reports today that “When the Labor Department releases the January unemployment report Friday, it will also update its estimate of jobs lost in the year that ended in March 2009. The number is expected to rise by roughly 800,000, raising the number of jobs shed during the recession to around 8 million.”
Translation: The Obama administration cooked the books to keep the unemployment rate artificially low. So when the new figures come out, I’ll guarantee you that at least media outlet will refer to them as “unexpected.”
Job losses from Great Recession about to get worse
UPDATE: No sooner did I make this post than I saw the AP headline “January unemployment rate drops to 9.7 percent.” And the very first sentence reads: “The unemployment rate dropped unexpectedly in January to 9.7 percent, while employers shed 20,000 jobs, according to a report that offered hope the economy will add jobs soon.”
It’s like Rush says, everything is unexpected to these journalists. They must have a macro or keystroke that immediately inserts the word “unexpected” into whatever economics story they happen to be writing.
It’s official
February 5, 2010 at 8:14 am | In U.S. Politics | Leave a CommentScott Brown is now Senator Scott Brown (R-MA) after he was sworn into office yesterday. Man, that looks weird: (R-MA). Let me type it again: (R-MA), (R-MA), (R-MA).
At any rate, you can read between the lines in the linked news story and tell the mainstream media are desperate for him to cross the aisle and vote with Democrats. Heh.
On the way out of Franklin
February 4, 2010 at 10:28 pm | In Pictures, Tennessee | Leave a CommentTags: Landmarks
Old church sighting
February 4, 2010 at 10:14 pm | In Pictures, Tennessee | Leave a CommentTags: Churches
I don’t know who does these Hitler videos, but they sure are funny
February 4, 2010 at 9:08 am | In Humor | Leave a Comment
A story within a story
February 4, 2010 at 9:01 am | In Media | Leave a CommentState-controlled Reuters ran a story a couple of days ago about backdoor taxes hitting the middle class (which they will, by the way), the White House more or less told Reuters to take it down, and so Reuters took it down. Thank goodness we have alternative media these days.
So what happened?
According to a Reuters rep, it was withdrawn “due to significant errors of fact.”
“The story was wrong on multiple points and should not have gone out,” she emailed us. A formal withdrawal will issued will address specific points that were incorrect later today.
UPDATE: A White House offical told Talking Points Memo that administration aides appealed to Reuters to take it down.
Reuters Withdraws ‘Backdoor Taxes To Hit Middle Class’ Story Linked By Drudge Report
Here, let me help you wipe the egg off your Nobel
February 4, 2010 at 8:57 am | In Global Warming | Leave a CommentThe Nobel-winning IPCC has had another plank of its award-winning 2007 report ripped up and run through a limb shredder. I have to hand it to the British media. If you want semi-honest reporting on global warming, the British media has it. The American media are so in bed with the global warming hucksters that they are loathe to run pieces like this.
A STARTLING report by the United Nations climate watchdog that global warming might wipe out 40% of the Amazon rainforest was based on an unsubstantiated claim by green campaigners who had little scientific expertise.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) said in its 2007 benchmark report that even a slight change in rainfall could see swathes of the rainforest rapidly replaced by savanna grassland.
The source for its claim was a report from WWF, an environmental pressure group, which was authored by two green activists. They had based their “research” on a study published in Nature, the science journal, which did not assess rainfall but in fact looked at the impact on the forest of human activity such as logging and burning. This weekend WWF said it was launching an internal inquiry into the study.
Of course, we get the obligatory, “Scientists fear the controversies will be used by climate change sceptics to sway public opinion to ignore global warming — even though the fundamental science, that greenhouse gases can heat the world, remains strong.”
Unbelievable. The entire hoax has blown up for all to see, going back to the Hadley CRU e-mails, yet the hucksters are clinging to the hoax.
Who knows? Someday we may read, “Scientists fear the the freezing over of hell will be used by climate change sceptics to sway public opinion to ignore global warming — even though the fundamental science, that greenhouse gases can heat the world, remains strong.”
Canadian journalist Lorne Gunter, writing for National Post, observes, “I can’t recall the wheels coming off the bus of any expert-driven hysteria as fast or as completely as they are now coming off the global-warming scare.”
UN climate panel shamed by bogus rainforest claim – Times Online
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.



