Right Minded Online

Conservative Commentary from Mark A. Rose

Archive for the ‘Blogging’ Category

Fellow bloggers, beware

without comments

Written by Mark

June 24, 2009 at 12:49 AM

Posted in Blogging

Posting by e-mail

without comments

WordPress has a new feature that enables you to post to your blog by e-mail. If you’re reading this post, it means the new feature works.

Written by Mark

June 15, 2009 at 9:08 PM

Posted in Blogging

Trying to spread the Atlas

without comments

Blue Collar Muse says he’s rereading Atlas Shrugged, and has even dedicated an entire blog category to Ayn Rand’s seminal novel.

New Category – “Atlas Shrugged” | Blue Collar Muse.

Written by Mark

May 12, 2009 at 7:51 AM

Posted in Blogging

TOTUS

without comments

President Obama’s teleprompter now has its very own blog, and has already made several posts.

Written by Mark

March 26, 2009 at 10:23 AM

Posted in Blogging

Dry reading, but…

without comments

Written by Mark

March 6, 2009 at 2:05 AM

Posted in Blogging

Rebuilt

without comments

I’m done rebuilding Right Minded from my lockdown at the expense at Blogger back in early August. I’ve imported all the pictures, newspaper columns, other major writings, and news stories of note, but had to let a lot of stuff go, mainly links to news-of-the-day items that are no longer relevant and not worth importing, or other information that was later integrated into newspaper columns. I had just passed 6,000 posts when Google ate my blog. Right now, I’ve got over 2,500 here, but I believe I’ve got a pretty complete blog set up now for me to fully work with.

If I had it all to do again, I’d start off at WordPress. I began blogging on April 30, 2004, just writing things into a plain .html document. In January, 2005, I bought markarose.com, and began using MovableType on March 1 of that year. Things were going great until about October 15, 2006, when MovableType stopped working. Rather than try to resurrect it, I began using Blogger under gotigers.blogspot.com, but had Blogger ftp the files up to markarose.com. That worked great until March 29, 2007, when I somehow lost the capability of ftp-ing up to markarose.com, and so I just went with Blogger directly, and set up markarose.com to simply redirect over to gotigers.blogspot.com.

But I missed uploading to my own domain, and so on June 30, 2008, I registered markarose.net through Google so I could have everything under markarose.net. Then, on August 3, Blogger disabled my blog, and so I saved all the monthly archive files as .html documents so I wouldn’t lose all my work, set up rightmindedblog.wordpress.com, called up my old hosting company, and had markarose.com point to WordPress.

As Johnny Cash used to sing, I’ve been everywhere, man. In life you don’t get do-overs, so the best you can do is learn from mistakes. If I only knew then what I know now, I would have set up a WordPress account back on April 30, 2004. I would have saved myself a lot of time and frustration, and not lost any work. But I’m happy with things now, happy that I’ve been able to preserve and integrate most of my work here, and I’m very happy with WordPress, as it is far more versatile than Blogger. And the best thing is, you can back up all your work at WordPress, because you have the ability to save the entire blog in a single .xml file, which you can save on your own hard drive, so no more losing work, even in a disaster.

Written by Mark

November 30, 2008 at 6:13 PM

Posted in Blogging, Right Minded

Gagged

without comments

Michelle Malkin has had quite an experience with censorship at YouTube and Google, which reminded me of my own curious experience at the hands of Google nearly four months ago.

Written by Mark

November 30, 2008 at 5:50 PM

Posted in Blogging

Great anti-global warming website

without comments

A reader has passed along the link to Watts Up With That?, a science and technology blog that uses facts to refute the global warming hoax.

Written by Mark

September 10, 2008 at 10:33 AM

I wonder if this has something to do with my Google account being suspended

with one comment

Stop the ACLU has had his anti-Obama blogspot account marked as spam, which is similar to what happened to me a couple of weeks ago. Stop the ACLU notes that the Google brass love Obama. One has to wonder.

Google are being evil : Stop The ACLU.

Written by Mark

August 18, 2008 at 4:55 PM

Posted in Blogging

An influential blog

without comments

A Minnesota blogger has knocked Al Franken’s senate campaign off stride. This never would have happened under the old media guard. But the old media don’t monopolize the flow of news and information anymore.

Senate candidate Al Franken wants to talk about jobs, health care and global warming. Republican blogger Michael Brodkorb wants to talk about Franken’s failure to pay all his income taxes on time.

Guess what everyone is talking about?

From the kitchen table in his tranquil suburban neighborhood, Brodkorb for the last year has used his blog “Minnesota Democrats Exposed” to launch a furious political assault on Franken. He’s labeled the former comedian and liberal commentator a “mean-spirited and un-Minnesotan” candidate who’s running a “desperate and ridiculous” campaign.

That’s routine stuff in the world of political blogging, but in the last two months Brodkorb has scored two direct hits that have the Franken campaign reeling. Brodkorb scooped the traditional media by detailing extensive bookkeeping problems in New York and California that ultimately prompted Franken, this week, to pay about $70,000 in back taxes to 17 states.

The stories have knocked Franken off balance as he prepares to take on Sen. Norm Coleman, in what’s expected to be one of the most expensive and toughest-fought U.S. Senate races this year.

Democrats have tried to downplay Brodkorb by portraying him as part of coordinated Republican attacks.

But what if Brodkorb were part of a coordinated Republican attack? Does that diminish the importance of Al Franken not paying taxes he legally owed? Is the story any less factual? No, of course not. Amazingly, Democrats are the ones who love taxes, despise the wealthy, and really despise wealthy individuals who don’t pay their taxes, so they, of anyone, should be the ones who are outraged.

Written by Mark

May 2, 2008 at 8:12 AM

Posted in Blogging

The bile of the blogosphere

without comments

Joe Klein, writing for Time, explains how vicious the blogosphere can be.

But the smart stuff is being drowned out by a fierce, bullying, often witless tone of intolerance that has overtaken the left-wing sector of the blogosphere. Anyone who doesn’t move in lockstep with the most extreme voices is savaged and ridiculed – especially people like me who often agree with the liberal position but sometimes disagree and are therefore considered traitorously unreliable. Some of this is understandable: the left-liberals in the blogosphere are merely aping the odious, disdainful – and politically successful – tone that right-wing radio talk-show hosts like Rush Limbaugh pioneered. They are also justifiably furious at a Bush White House that has specialized in big lies and smear tactics.

The timing of Klein’s piece is perfect given that I just found out about this today.

Written by Mark

June 7, 2007 at 8:02 PM

Posted in Blogging

They just can’t stand to not be in control

without comments

I was reading Bob Krumm’s blog earlier this evening when I noticed that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s lobbying reform bill includes a provision that would require bloggers who draw more than 500 readers to “to register and report quarterly to Congress the same as the big K Street lobbyists.”

Fortunately, the legislation did not receive enough votes to overcome a GOP filibuster, but we bloggers are going to have to sleep with one eye open from now on as this bill will surely come up again later in the current session.

I’m not sure what would possess members of the U.S. Senate to extend their broad umbrella of control to bloggers like me, unless they just can’t stand for something as large and burgeoning as the blogosphere to continue to prosper without them exerting some kind of control over it. I guess Joe Public, armed with nothing more than a PC, Internet access, a blogspot account, and an opinion scares some politicians silly. I don’t get it.

I honestly don’t know what all is buried in the Democrats’ lobbying reform bill, but I have a hunch that it would end up much like campaign finance reform. Just as CFR was supposed to get the money out of politics, the lobbying reform bill proposes to more or less end corruption in Washington. Well, CFR didn’t get the money out of politics. It just routed it through different channels while criminalizing certain avenues of free speech. Likewise, although there may be certain parts of lobbying reform that may be worthwhile, it would inevitably produce the same result as CFR. Lobbyists wouldn’t go away. They would just have to operate through different channels. (Remember the simple axiom “follow the money.”) Really the only thing that would be regulated would be the freedom of expression currently enjoyed by average citizens such as us bloggers.

UPDATE: Michael Silence has more. And ACK suggests that the hoopla may not be what it seems. In addition, Focus on the Family has been against the lobbying reform bill from the outset, and included its defeat in its evening CitizenLink update. There was no mention of the blogging provision. Stay tuned. It may turn out to be much ado about nothing, but I also wouldn’t put it past Congress, either.

Written by Mark

January 18, 2007 at 7:51 PM

Posted in Blogging, U.S. Politics

Great blog on economics

without comments

I don’t know how my brother finds these things, but he has introduced me to the best blog on economics I’ve run across. It’s called “Cafe Hayek,” and is written by Don Boudreaux and Russ Roberts. Most recently, they’ve done some fine work on the minimum wage.

Written by Mark

June 27, 2006 at 4:31 PM

Posted in Blogging, Economics

Is inference a fact?

without comments

I’m still a little puzzled by all this Joe Wilson stuff. Following this morning’s post on the rush to judgement over the CIA leak that wasn’t, Glen Dean picked up the ball, and an interesting comment thread ensued over on his site.

My post was directed at Nashville Is Talking and Volunteer Voters. To her credit, Brittney issued a retraction at NIT regarding that CIA leak allegation. (For the record, I’ve had to do that, too.) And at Glen Dean’s site, Brittney again comments that she was hasty. Hey, who among us hasn’t done that, too? I sure have.

Brittney then stuck to her guns by asserting that my post “does very little to refute the truth” and “But the fact remains that he did declassify information in order to discredit Joe Wilson.” So I asked Brittney for her source material, not to be cute, but because I seriously wanted to analyze this, and if there’s some information out there that contradicts my understanding thus far, I want to be privy to it.

At any rate, Brittney answered “I have no source material that plainly states that. That sentiment is something I’ve inferred after reading articles and news reports about the goings-on.”

Brittney even factually asserted on the NIT site back on April 7 that “our Commander-in-Chief declassified sensitive information in efforts to discredit Joe Wilson’s research in Niger.”

But she has no source material to back this up. It’s only a sentiment that she’s inferred. In other words, she has a theory that she’s trying to pass off as fact. I’ve got no problem with a person having theories, even if they are different from my own. Heck, I’ve got a theory about Bob Rochelle that’s based on inference, but I plainly state that it’s only a theory — not factual.

I know Nashville Is Talking is not set up under the rules of traditional journalism, and, unlike others, I’ve got no problem with the left-wing bias over there. It would be supremely hypocritical of me to criticize Brittney for being biased and one-sided, because I take great pride in being partisan myself. But still, I’m not going to infer a theory and pass it off as fact when I’ve got no sources to back it up. Likewise, when I write columns for the Lebanon Democrat, I know I’ve got to dot every “i” and cross every “t” because there are readers out there who don’t like me very much, and would love to run a sword through one of my columns and send it in as a letter-to-the-editor. I know I have to base my arguments on something solid.

That said, I expect the same of others — that if you’re going to make a factual accusation against the Commander-in-Chief — or anyone — then it has to be factual. If you want to start with the same set of facts and draw a different conclusion, then fine. But you’ve got to have the source material to start with. Sentiment and inference don’t quite take the place of hard facts.

Well, I’ve said enough — probably too much — about all this. I’ll let someone else have the last word.

Written by Mark

April 13, 2006 at 6:20 PM

Posted in Blogging, U.S. Politics

A good resource

without comments

Ben Cunningham sent out a link to “10 Journalism Tips For Bloggers, Podcasters & Other E-Writers.” There’s some good stuff in here.

Written by Mark

December 8, 2005 at 8:36 AM

Posted in Blogging

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Senator Rosalind Kurita cares”

without comments

On Monday, August 29, I had the privilege of joining seven other Nashville-area bloggers at a lunch with State Senator Rosalind Kurita, who is running for the U.S. Senate. (The bloggers consisted of three liberals, four conservatives, and one libertarian.)

Although the discussion was informal, it was understood that everything was on the record, and Senator Kurita, for the most part, showed herself to be a straight-shooter.

Perhaps the most poignant statement Senator Kurita made during the hour-plus discussion followed a request that she distinguish herself from fellow Democrat and candidate Harold Ford, Jr.

Said Kurita, “I know what it means to work hard for a living. I have worked for everything I have. I’m married. I have three children. I know what it means to save money for college. I know what it means to punch a time clock. I’ve worked the night shift. I’ve worked a swing shift. I know how to do a day’s work. I’m a nurse. I have really had to take responsibility for my actions. When you take care of people who have their lives in your hands, that’s accountability.”

The liberal side of Senator Kurita came out when she discussed U.S. energy policy. “We do not need to drill in the [Alaska National Wildlife Refuge], and it’s ridiculous that we — that bill passed the House. If we changed the speed limit, we could save more money than we could get out of the ANWR.”

Of course, the only way to lower gas prices is to extract more oil. Senator Kurita argued for alternative energy, but a capitalist economy cannot force its consumers into an alternative for which there is little demand at the present. The current demand is for more oil, and there’s plenty out there.

But there were several areas in which Senator Kurita and I agree.

On ethics, for example, Senator Kurita noted “I think that if someone has been an elected official, that they should not be a lobbyist. I think that the cooling off period is not very realistic. Once somebody is your peer they are always your peer, and that relationship isn’t going to change. I think that that’s more important than any other aspect that we look at in terms of the lobbyists. And I think we should have a reporting of lobbyists’ salaries, and this business that you make extra money if you accomplish a certain goal, I don’t like that. I really believe we need to change the culture on Capitol Hill.”

Senator Kurita has a strong love of the military, and deeply appreciates the fact that Ft. Campbell lies in her legislative district. She spoke very warmly of our soldiers and their families. When asked about Harold Ford, Jr.’s reference to our troops in Iraq as “oil cops,” Senator Kurita referred to them as “very brave soldiers,” and remarked that Ford’s characterization “doesn’t feel right.”

Senator Kurita shoots skeet out on the gun range at Ft. Campbell, and the troops she meets tell her things are going much better on the war front than are being reported by the media.

She also spoke very approvingly of fellow Senator Mae Beavers, acknowledging their friendly relationship and that Senator Beavers is a very strong woman (referring to her battle with cancer last year.)

I asked Senator Kurita if she believes President Bush’s judicial nominees each deserve an up-or-down vote. Senator Kurita cited the Senate’s “advice and consent” role, and that those charged in that role need information on each nominee and need to be fair. She believes it is “reasonable” for each nominee to receive an up-or-down vote, and that individuals should think for themselves and not vote one way or another simply because someone else tells them to.

Senator Kurita does not support a state income tax or the sales tax increase that got pushed through three years ago. She opposed the Supreme Court’s recent Kelo decision, and says there is “no way” a business should be able to take a person’s home.

She believes the way to erase deficit-spending at the federal level is to “stop spending.” Government programs have to work, and Senator Kurita cited the Medicaid program as one that needs reform — that the regulations currently on the book are too broad. We have to be realistic about expenditures.

The bloggers’ lunch with a top shelf U.S. Senate candidate was the first of its kind in the Nashville area, and exhibits the growing influence of blogs on politics. We were more or less able to interview a candidate who showed us the human side of a politician that voters rarely get to see. There were no sound bytes, no tap dancing, no campaign slogans — only open and honest discussion, transcripts of which were posted on several blogs by that evening.

Senator Rosalind Kurita showed herself to be a gracious lady, and seems to be genuine in her role as a representative of the people. Although there are issues on which she and I will have fundamental differences, one would have a hard time denying that she has the best interests of her constituents at heart.

Written by Mark

September 28, 2005 at 1:18 PM

$1,983.61

without comments

That’s what Right Minded is worth over at BlogShares.

Well, you gotta start somewhere.

Written by Mark

August 24, 2005 at 12:57 AM

Posted in Blogging

Sometimes blogging does pay

without comments

I’m not exactly earning a living running Right Minded. In fact, I haven’t even seen my first penny. I did earn a free iPod back in March, which is still working fine despite excessive use. Then, several days ago, a reader who noted that I referenced a 1946 article in Life magazine in my July 7 column, gave me her copy of an even older Life magazine, this one dated July 5, 1943. It’s in good shape, and I’m grateful to own this piece of history.

Written by Mark

August 4, 2005 at 8:25 AM

Posted in Blogging

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Alternative media newest watchdog”

without comments

On February 3, Senators Bill Ketron and Ron Ramsey filed Senate Bill 698, which would authorize county legislative bodies to impose motor vehicle privilege taxes by resolution or referendum only. Its companion bill in the House of Representatives, HB714, was filed the same day by Representatives John Hood, Jerome Cochran, Les Winningham, Sherry Jones, David Davis, and David Hawk. HB714/SB698 would make it much easier for local governments to raise the wheel tax by requiring only a simple majority instead of the two-thirds majority now required. The bill would also remove the ability of Tennesseans to get a wheel tax on the ballot by petition once a county commission passes it.

This was done most recently in Carroll and Dickson Counties, where county commissions passed $10 and $20 wheel tax increases last October. Carroll County residents turned in 1,400 petition signatures to their election commission on November 10. Citizens also led a petition drive in Dickson County, and turned in 2,561 signatures to their election commission on November 17. The successful petition drives forced the wheel tax increases onto ballots in both counties. On January 21, Dickson County residents approved their wheel tax increase by a large margin, and Carroll County voters did the same a week later. No one can complain, because the voters had their say. It is imperative that this legal avenue be preserved on behalf of the taxpayers.

Now, on February 24, Tennessee Tax Revolt (TTR) sent out an alert via e-mail and it’s website that SB698 had been placed on the calendar for the State and Local Government Committee on March 1, and asked concerned citizens to contact Senators Ketron and Ramsey to voice disapproval. TTR is a conservative watchdog group that eyes state and local governments across Tennessee and alerts taxpayers of efforts by elected officials to either raise existing taxes or implement new ones, and also pushes for Taxpayer Bills of Rights at various levels of government. TTR was born during the successful goalline stand against the state income tax a few years ago.

The February 24 alert was picked up by conservative talk radio and several Internet bloggers (pundits who run political websites called “weblogs”), including Nashville journalist Bill Hobbs, Knoxville News-Sentinel blogger Michael Silence, as well as Right Minded. With the exception of Silence’s post, Tennessee’s mainstream media either ignored this remarkable turn of events, or they completely missed it.

Right Minded gladly joined the cadence and followed through with e-mails to both senators on the 24th voicing opposition to SB698. The following afternoon, I received the following reply from Senator Ketron: “When the lobbyist asked Senator Ramsey and I to introduce the bill it was presented differently than the bill that was drafted by Legal Services. My support for this bill will [be] withdrawn as of Monday.” Tennessee Tax Revolt confirmed that day that Senator Ramsey was also withdrawing his support for SB698.

Representative Cochran, following an impassioned trail of denial, finally conceded to Bill Hobbs in an e-mail on the 25th that “The intent of my legislation was to prevent the legislature from circumventing the will of the people and passing wheel taxes through private acts. It was my intent for the bill to amend only TCA Sec. 5-8-102 (c)(1), but it was drafted and inadvertently deleted the entire (c) section. That was [a] mistake that I just noticed in the bill’s enacting language and take responsibility for.”

It appears that someone pulled a bait-and-switch on the sponsors of this legislation. Alternative media had picked it out of a database of more than 4,500 indexed bills that have been filed this session, exposed it for what it was, alerted the public, and within 24 hours both senate sponsors had pull out. These events happened right under the noses of the mainstream media, and there’s still no indication they’ve taken notice.

Indeed, the state’s large-circulation newspapers, such as the Tennessean, which have reporters dedicated to state political coverage, are missing a rich opportunity to uncover the answers to some critical questions, specifically:

Who is the lobbyist(s) who convinced six representatives and two senators to sponsor this bill? Which organization employs this lobbyist(s)?

What happened between the time this bill was submitted and the time it was actually drafted? Who is responsible for the bait-and-switch?

How often does it occur that our legislators sponsor bills that end up being different from what they had intended? Do sponsors review their bills after they’ve been drafted? Why does it take alternative media to point these things out?

I have e-mailed Senator Ketron and requested the affiliation of the lobbyist in question. As of this writing, I have yet to received a response. Still, blogger Adam Groves, who authors a top-notch weblog on Tennessee politics, correctly noted “Politicians take note, the blog is here to affect Tennessee politics” once Senators Ketron and Ramsey announced their intent to pull their support from the wheel tax bill. Even if nothing else comes of this turn of events, the score on HB714/SB698 stands at alternative media, 1, politicians and lobbyists, 0.

Written by Mark

March 1, 2005 at 12:59 PM

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Conservatives use Internet successfully”

without comments

When conservative talk radio emerged with the onset of the Rush Limbaugh Show sixteen years ago, it marked the beginning of the end of the Old Media’s stranglehold on what was aired over the nation’s airwaves and read in its newspapers. Conservative media became popular because they satisfied a need in a population which had felt disconnected from the Old Media for years. That conservatives have enjoyed unprecedented success in national elections during the past decade owes largely to the rise of this New Media.

Of course, the New Media isn’t confined only to talk radio. Conservative news sources also proliferate across the Internet. And even some newspapers, such as the New York Post and Washington Times, while not necessarily slanting conservative, have certainly eschewed the liberal bias obvious in such monoliths as the New York Times and Los Angeles Times. And viewers also have Fox News to turn to for more even-handed reporting, as opposed to those bastions of liberalism, ABC, CBS, and NBC — the “Big Three” — plus CNN, PBS, and MSNBC, which also lean leftward.

But aside from talk radio, nothing has proven as valuable to conservatives as the Internet. Granted, liberals have climbed aboard the Internet, too, but the wealth of information available on the Internet has provided a chisel conservatives have used to chip away the smoke screen the left has used to shroud itself from the American people for half a century. Facts are far easier to find now, and often expose fraud from all political directions if one has the desire to search for them.

Websites such as the Drudge Report, which reports news often snubbed by the mainstream media, averages more than 8,000,000 visits per day. Other sites, such as NewsMax.com and WorldNetDaily.com, keep the mainstream media more honest by reporting news that is sometimes condemnatory of the left — and which the Old Media used to ignore altogether.

Then there’s Townhall.com, which posts a plethora of op/ed pieces –- several a day, in fact — from syndicated conservative columnists. In other words, readers seeking conservative commentary are no longer at the mercy of newspaper editorial departments. They can simply go to Townhall.com and read columns from Robert Novak, Ann Coulter, Phyllis Schafly, Walter Williams, and Mike Adams, for example, as well as the highly-illumined conservative patriarch Thomas Sowell.

However, one phenomenon that has exploded during the past three years, while flying largely beneath the mainstream media’s radar beam, is the spread of weblogs (or “blogs”). Blogs are websites run by individuals (”bloggers”) who make frequent posts and provide information and commentary on their favorite topics. Blogs allow individuals with certain expertise, but no formal connection to established media, to provide useful information to an audience they could never have otherwise reached.

Of course, liberals have used Internet blogs to their advantage, too, but conservatives have run such a marvelous detour around the mainstream press that they possess a far greater share of the blog market (”blogosphere”). There are far more noteworthy conservative bloggers than can be listed here, but they run the scale from the nationally-known Michelle Malkin, to Nashville journalist Bill Hobbs, to your humble Right Minded columnist.

Just during the election cycle, it was the conservative blogosphere that spread the message of the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth — a group of Vietnam Veterans who served with John Kerry, but had a far different story to tell — who were ignored by the mainstream media.

Bloggers picked apart the fraudulent Dan Rather story of President Bush’s supposed National Guard AWOL, exposing the fake memoranda cited by Rather and holding CBS’ feet to the fire long before the fraud emerged as a mainstream news story.

It was also the blogosphere and alternative media which defused and rendered impotent the October Surprises launched by the New York Times and Osama bin Laden just days before the election.

In his column on November 27, 2003, Thomas Sowell shared the keenest statement ever made about liberalism: “A careful definition of words would destroy half the agenda of the political left and scrutinizing evidence would destroy the other half.” The harvest reaped by conservatives through alternative media is nothing more than an ocean of information — the very evidence, in fact, needed to destroy the agenda of the political left. Indeed, the Internet has become such a mode of success for conservatives that Al Gore is probably wishing he’d never invented it.

Written by Mark

November 19, 2004 at 12:00 PM