Right Minded Online

Conservative Commentary from Mark A. Rose

Archive for the ‘Christmas’ Category

Paranoid about Christmas

without comments

It’s amazing the lengths to which liberals will go in order to sidestep anything related to Christianity. These people are absolutely paranoid about offending that one person, even if it means the manjority gets the shaft.

A public interest law firm has launched a new attack on what it calls an “anti-Christmas virus” evidenced by a school district that banned even traditional Christmas tunes.

The Ann Arbor, Mich.-based Thomas More Law Center says its lawyers filed a brief in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia in a case challenging a New Jersey districts ban on the melodies.

“As so often is the case,” the firm said, “a complaint from one parent resulted in the districts policy that banned the playing of all Christmas music, including simple instrumentals without words.”

Religious tunes banned by school.

Written by Mark

December 27, 2008 at 11:52 AM

Posted in Christmas, Education

The birthday of a king

without comments

Written by Mark

December 25, 2008 at 8:46 AM

The real story of Christmas

with 4 comments

A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham: Abraham was the father of Isaac, Isaac the father of Jacob, Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers, Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron, Hezron the father of Ram, Ram the father of Amminadab, Amminadab the father of Nahshon, Nahshon the father of Salmon, Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab, Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth, Obed the father of Jesse, and Jesse the father of King David. David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah’s wife, Solomon the father of Rehoboam, Rehoboam the father of Abijah, Abijah the father of Asa, Asa the father of Jehoshaphat, Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram, Jehoram the father of Uzziah, Uzziah the father of Jotham, Jotham the father of Ahaz, Ahaz the father of Hezekiah, Hezekiah the father of Manasseh, Manasseh the father of Amon, Amon the father of Josiah, and Josiah the father of Jeconiah and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon. After the exile to Babylon: Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel, Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel, Zerubbabel the father of Abiud, Abiud the father of Eliakim, Eliakim the father of Azor, Azor the father of Zadok, Zadok the father of Akim, Akim the father of Eliud, Eliud the father of Eleazar, Eleazar the father of Matthan, Matthan the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. Thus there were fourteen generations in all from Abraham to David, fourteen from David to the exile to Babylon, and fourteen from the exile to the Christ. (Matthew 1:1-17)

In the sixth month, God sent the angel Gabriel to Nazareth, a town in Galilee, to a virgin pledged to be married to a man named Joseph, a descendant of David. The virgin’s name was Mary. The angel went to her and said, “Greetings, you who are highly favored! The Lord is with you.” Mary was greatly troubled at his words and wondered what kind of greeting this might be. But the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, you have found favor with God. You will be with child and give birth to a son, and you are to give him the name Jesus. He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever; his kingdom will never end.” “How will this be,” Mary asked the angel, “since I am a virgin?” The angel answered, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you. So the holy one to be born will be called the Son of God. Even Elizabeth your relative is going to have a child in her old age, and she who was said to be barren is in her sixth month. For nothing is impossible with God.” “I am the Lord’s servant,” Mary answered. “May it be to me as you have said.” Then the angel left her. (Luke 1:26-38)

In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. (This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.) And everyone went to his own town to register. So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn. And there were shepherds living out in the fields nearby, keeping watch over their flocks at night. An angel of the Lord appeared to them, and the glory of the Lord shone around them, and they were terrified. But the angel said to them, “Do not be afraid. I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people. Today in the town of David a Savior has been born to you; he is Christ the Lord. This will be a sign to you: You will find a baby wrapped in cloths and lying in a manger.” Suddenly a great company of the heavenly host appeared with the angel, praising God and saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace to men on whom his favor rests.” When the angels had left them and gone into heaven, the shepherds said to one another, “Let’s go to Bethlehem and see this thing that has happened, which the Lord has told us about.” So they hurried off and found Mary and Joseph, and the baby, who was lying in the manger. When they had seen him, they spread the word concerning what had been told them about this child, and all who heard it were amazed at what the shepherds said to them. But Mary treasured up all these things and pondered them in her heart. The shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things they had heard and seen, which were just as they had been told. (Luke 2:1-20)

After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.” When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. When he had called together all the people’s chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born. “In Bethlehem in Judea,” they replied, “for this is what the prophet has written: ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you will come a ruler who will be the shepherd of my people Israel.’” Then Herod called the Magi secretly and found out from them the exact time the star had appeared. He sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.” After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh. And having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, they returned to their country by another route. When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. “Get up,” he said, “take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.” So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.” (Matthew 2:1-15)

Footnote: The genealogy of Jesus Christ given in Matthew 1 does not include those 19 generations that preceded Abraham. (The numbers in parentheses are the ages of the men when they became fathers to the next members in the line of succession.) They are Adam (130), Seth (105), Enosh (90), Kenan (70), Mahalalel (65), Jared (162), Enoch (65), Methuselah (187), Lamech (182), Noah (500), Shem (100), Arphaxad (35), Shelah (30), Eber (34), Peleg (30), Reu (32), Serug (30), Nahor (29), Terah (70), and Abram, who became Abraham, and was born 1,946 years after the creation of Adam. Therefore, all of the generations from Adam to Jesus Christ are 61.

Written by Mark

December 25, 2008 at 12:00 AM

Posted in Christianity, Christmas

Tagged with

18 years ago today

without comments

(The following post is an excerpt from My Italian Experience, and tells the story of my attending Christmas Eve mass at St. Peter’s Cathedral in the Vatican City on December 24-25, 1990. I spent three straight Christmases away from home during my time in the Navy, all of them in Italy, and my last one there, described below, was also the most memorable. This is about as good a Christmas as you can have while separated from your family.)

George and I attended Christmas Eve mass last night at the Vatican. Since my work schedule had prevented my attending the ceremony the previous two years, I seized the opportunity this time. The weather was perfect for a trip to Rome: raining, chilly, and quite dreary.

During the morning, George’s roommate offered to drive us to Stazione Centrale. We left more than an hour before our 12:10 train was scheduled to depart. Traffic was worse than I had ever seen it. By the time we entered downtown, still several blocks from the train station, we stopped, and waited. George and I became increasingly uneasy. By 11:45, not having moved in some twenty minutes, and still with a few blocks to go, George and I got out and walked the remaining half-mile (in the rain, of course).

We made our way briskly through the usual maze of pedestrians, sidewalk vendors, and mopeds. Along the way, we discovered the problem. At an intersection, three lanes of traffic, each heading its own direction, had converged. It appeared deadlock would prevail for some time. Of course, there were no traffic policemen present.

George and I arrived at the station a minute or two after noon, and had to stand in line for a couple of minutes to get tickets. After purchasing “due biglietti per Roma e ritorno” (two round-trip tickets to Rome) at Lit. 23,600 ($19) apiece, we ran downstairs and made it to binario (track) three just before the espresso from Salerno arrived as scheduled.

We scrambled to find a partially vacant compartment, then seated ourselves. The train followed the subway line through Naples and into Pozzuoli before turning north toward Rome. I had brought my camera and an excess of film along with my usual cache of paraphernalia: umbrella, walkman, tapes. I put on headphones and dozed for a good portion of the journey.

The ride through the mountainous Italian countryside was serene, as usual, the dark clouds adding a touch of mystique. The rain was light but steady. We were taking an espresso, and there were no stops between Naples and Rome. The ride was enjoyable. During our journey, I visited the dining car, three cars from ours, for snacks, returning with cookies and drinks.

The ancient walls just outside the city gave the first indication of our imminent arrival. We rolled through the maze of tracks and pulled into the far left track, number twenty-six, at Roma Termini. It was a little after 2:00. We had arrived a couple of minutes early. The ride had taken two hours. We were in Rome. The weather had not changed. I was wearing my overcoat and a sweater, so the cool dampness did not affect me much.

Our initial endeavor was to visit a music store, one of several shops in the train station. We found nothing of interest, so we moved along.

We then decided to visit the USO, down the street from St. Peter’s Square, to get our tickets for mass. I had reserved them earlier in the week via telephone from Naples. They were free, but we had to get them by closing time, five o’clock.

George and I went down to the subway and purchased tickets (Lit. 700, or $0.60, apiece). We then headed for Line A (the other subway line in Rome being, of course, Line B), and awaited the next train. It soon arrived. Surprisingly, it wasn’t very crowded.

We traveled six stops westward to the end of the line. Boarding at Termini, we passed Repubblica, Barberini, Spagna, Flaminio, and Lepanto. We arrived at Ottaviano shortly, and made the half-mile walk south to St. Peter’s Square, then east to the USO. After obtaining the tickets, George attempted to telephone home, but the phone at the USO was out of order.

By now, we were thinking about food. We walked back to St. Peter’s Square, stopping briefly to admire the nativity scene and take pictures of each other with the cathedral as a backdrop, then walked back to the subway station.

We traveled two stops east to Flaminio. Walking through the underground tunnel, the street vendors and musicians had gathered en masse, open guitar cases catching a few coins. We ascended to the street near Piazza del Popolo. It was my idea to stop here for food. We walked around for perhaps fifteen minutes in search of a café where we could get a snack. By now it was four o’clock.

George and I found a nice, albeit small café in an underpass connecting Piazza del Popolo and a street leading to Villa Borghese. The neighborhood seemed familiar. I realized I had been here the year before, on August 2, when I had visited Villa Borghese.

Meanwhile, we sat down and enjoyed two small calzoni (folded pizzas) apiece and a coke. It was just something to hold us until dinner. We hadn’t eaten since breakfast.

Most restaurants in Italy don’t open until seven or seven-thirty in the evening, so we had to eat something. After we finished, we walked into Piazza del Popolo, one of the most beautiful piazzas in all of Rome, with its Egyptian obelisk standing in the center. By now it was almost dark. A handful of people standing atop the Pincine Hill, accessible from the piazza, were looking across the piazza and the nightlit city. It must have been an awesome view with dusk now settling over Rome.

George suggested we return to the Vatican. We rode the subway, then began the casual walk toward St. Peter’s Square. In the meantime, we decided to stop in a bar for cappuccino and relax for a few minutes. We drank our cappuccino and even enjoyed gelato to go. We departed abruptly after the bartender wouldn’t allow us to sit. (Italians are very peculiar about this.)

We made our way back to St. Peter’s Square to once again admire the nativity scene, now lit, and the huge Christmas tree beside it. It was adorned with hundreds of lights. We both made a couple of photographs and departed.

As the time approached six o’clock, I made a stop at a pay telephone as George waited nearby. He had made a brief call earlier while in the Flaminio subway station just after we had eaten and were returning to the Vatican.

By now the rain had become intermittent. We craved a meal soon. George suggested L’Etrusco, an osteria near St. Peter’s, which he had frequented before. I had no reason to object. We walked around the neighborhood talking, window shopping, and trying to whittle away the time until seven. We circumnavigated the same city block several times, passing L’Etrusco, hungrily, each trip.

Thinking ahead, we were also trying to determine which buses, if any, would be able to take us to either Stazione Ostiense or Stazione Tiburtina, where trains would be leaving during the early morning for Naples. Stazione Termini would close at midnight. We had gotten some information at the USO, but an inquiry posed at a nearby information booth proved this invalid. We decided we would be forced to take a taxi to one of the stations. There would be no buses in the area after midnight.

Around a quarter before seven George and I decided to enter L’Etrusco to see if it was open. To our amazement, it was. It had opened early because of the midnight mass. We sat at a table near the door.

The dining area was characteristically small, perhaps a dozen or so tables. We were given menus, and soon ordered caprese for antipasto. For a first course, I enjoyed fettucini. We both ordered the white house wine.

As our food was being prepared, the restaurant began to fill. A half-hour after our arrival as the first guests, the dining room was full. We were joined by a mixture of Germans, Italians, Brits, and Americans.

George and I enjoyed a slow meal, even ordering a second liter of wine to help us pass the time. We also ordered third courses, then desserts. As the evening progressed, the osteria grew increasingly boisterous. Finally, a young man carrying a guitar entered from the street to exchange entertainment for coins. He must have played some popular Italian songs, for around half the patrons began singing along. We shook our heads in disbelief.

Shortly after nine o’clock, George and I decided to leave. We asked for the bill. It was surprisingly small, Lit. 43,500 ($35). We then made the short walk to St. Peter’s Square. There we waited in a long line to enter the cathedral. We met some Canadians who stood in front of us.

Following an hour wait, the line began to move. We walked up the steps of the cathedral where a group of Carabinieri were directing guests to the proper entrance. The tickets were color-coded as per language. George and I were directed to the north side of the cathedral where we entered through Porta Rezzonico. We were seated with other English-speaking folks.

Having entered the cathedral at ten-thirty, we had some ninety minutes before the commencement of the mass. An organist played one of the pipe organs. The sound was phenomenal. We passed a little time by taking a few photographs and skimming the programs given us as we had entered. Only a small portion was inscribed in English.

As midnight approached, the cathedral filled to capacity, some twenty thousand. The suspense was agonizing. A choir began singing a few minutes before midnight, and finally, at twelve, the lights brightened and the crowd stood as the papal court entered the enormous sanctuary. In fact, the court walked down the aisle to my immediate left. The ceremony had begun.

The mass was conducted in a multitude of languages, George and I understanding only a fraction. Unfortunately, we were not afforded the best of seats. In fact, we were several rows from the pope, some twenty-five meters away. Invariably, each time the pontiff turned toward our side, several people in front of us stood with their cameras.

The ceremony was scheduled to end at two o’clock. George and I grew increasingly tired and oblivious to the mass. We decided to leave a little early, walking out at a quarter past one.

Our first endeavor was to find a taxi. We walked out of St. Peter’s Square, turning north. With a mighty stroke of luck, a vacant white taxi turned south onto the street facing us. We stopped him and asked how much he would charge to take us to Ostiense. “Trenta mila,” he replied after conferring with the gentleman sitting beside him. That was reasonable. I then asked his price for driving us to Tiburtina. “Quaranta mila,” he replied. We therefore opted for the ride to Tiburtina. It was a little farther, and would therefore cost a little more, but the next train for Naples would depart there at two-thirty, vice three-thirty from Ostiense. We did not wish to wait in the cold an additional hour to save Lit. 10,000 ($8).

The taxi cruised the empty streets of Rome for the twenty-minute ride to Tiburtina. We arrived at two o’clock, paid the Lit. 40,000 ($32), and entered the station. It was deserted, less a handful of homeless. We checked the schedule for the track our train would use, then sauntered over to track two to await our train.

The train we would board had left from Milan earlier in the evening. It was headed for Palermo in Sicily. George and I reasoned it would be rather full. When it arrived, just after two-thirty, we were proven correct. We searched most of the train, composed mostly of sleeper cars, until finally discovering a compartment near the front with two empty seats.

This train was also an espresso, and it, too, made no stops between Rome and Naples. I listened to my walkman for most of the journey, nodding off occasionally. George slept most of the way. The train ride passed rather quickly as we pulled into Napoli Centrale at five o’clock Christmas morning. A short taxi ride back to Capodichino marked the end of our trip.

I rose at ten o’clock that morning so George and I could go to some friends’ home for the afternoon. We took the bus from Capodichino to Agnano, and were driven from there by car.

Written by Mark

December 24, 2008 at 8:49 PM

Posted in Christmas, Right Minded

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Guide us to that Perfect Light”

without comments

On the night Jesus was born, a star shone in the sky such as had never been seen before. We know the star could be seen from afar, as the Gospel of Matthew tells us that Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and inquired, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.”

King Herod heard of the inquiry and was disturbed that there was another King of the Jews. So he called together the chief priests and teachers of the law, asking them where the Christ was to be born.

“In Bethlehem in Judea,” he was told, “for this is what the prophet [Micah] has written: ’But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you will come a ruler who will be the shepherd of my people Israel.’”

King Herod then summoned the Magi in secret, asking them the exact time the star had appeared. He sent the Magi to Bethlehem and said, “Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.”

After they had heard the king, the Magi went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed.

We don’t know a great deal about the Magi, except that they came from the east. We often refer to them as the three wise men or three kings, but they were probably nothing more than superstitious astrologers who knew nothing of the Jewish faith or the prophecies that told of a coming Messiah, which makes their appearance at Joseph and Mary’s front door all the more remarkable.

Most nativity scenes depict the presence of the Magi bearing gifts, but the Magi weren’t present at the manger on the night Christ was born. They only began their journey then or shortly thereafter, and their journey probably lasted a couple of years, as the Christ is here referred to as “the child,” and not “the baby,” as he is called in the Gospel of Luke on the night he was born.

At any rate, when they arrived at the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. The Magi then presented the child with their gifts of gold, incense, and myrrh (referred to as ”treasures” in the Gospel in Matthew) – not exactly practical gifts for a peasant Jewish family, but when you’re giving gifts to the Messiah, no gift is ever too good.

Afterward, having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, the Magi began their journey home, back to their own country, taking a different route. By all implication, the three Magi were all warned separately, in different dreams, suggesting a divine revelation.

Once the Magi had departed, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream, saying “Get up, take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.”

By this time, angels of the Lord had established a pretty good track record with Joseph, and so he did not wait. He took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where they remained until the death of King Herod, thus fulfilling a prophecy of Hosea, “Out of Egypt I called my son.”

Meanwhile, when King Herod discovered that he had been outwitted, he became furious, and issued his famous decree that all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity aged two years and under be killed, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. Thus, what was said through the prophet Jeremiah was also fulfilled: ”A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be comforted, because they are no more.”

After King Herod died, an angel of the Lord appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt instructing him to “Get up, take the child and his mother and go to the land of Israel, for those who were trying to take the child’s life are dead.”

Once again, Joseph did as he was told. He took the child and his mother back to Israel. But when Joseph heard that Archelaus was reigning in Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go back. Having been warned in yet another dream, Joseph instead withdrew to the district of Galilee, and he, Mary, and the Christ lived in a town called Nazareth. So was fulfilled what was said through the prophets: “He will be called a Nazarene.”

No one can be exactly sure why the Magi play such a prominent role in the birth story of the Christ. They were unlikely characters, having come from a different country, with a different culture, a different language, and a different religion.

Despite this, they were still able to find the Christ child after merely following a star and asking a few questions. King Herod, on the other hand, had the Christ child right under his nose in Judea, yet was never able to get his hands on the real King of the Jews.

Perhaps the irony of this unlikely series of events is the reason for its inclusion in Christ’s birth story, that the Lord God wanted to add one more wonder to a story that was already filled with miracles and the fulfillment of prophecies that were made centuries before.

There is no way the Magi could have known that their journey, their encounter with King Herod, and their presentation of gifts from the East to the Christ child would be preserved in the most-printed book of all time, to be read by persons in many languages, from all over the world, across two millennia.

Written by Mark

December 23, 2008 at 6:00 PM

Oh come let us adore him

without comments

In San Francisco this evening, they’re having an Obama-themed tree-lighting ceremony. Oh boy. These people need help.

Written by Mark

December 4, 2008 at 7:41 PM

Posted in Christmas

A quarter century

with one comment

Fans of A Christmas Story, which is one of my own favorite movies, are celebrating the 25th anniversary of the making of that movie.

“It’s a film about being a kid and looking back,” said Brian Jones, who owns the house where the movie was shot and the neighboring museum dedicated to the film.

About 4,000 fans are attending the convention at Cleveland’s Renaissance Hotel, where they’ll meet some of the film’s actors, watch three documentaries made about the film and see the original 1938 fire truck from a famous scene in the movie involving a child’s tongue stuck to a frozen pole.

Wikipedia even has an entry on the house that was used to film the movie. The house has a story of its own: “In December 2004, Brian Jones, a San Diego entrepreneur and fan of the film since childhood, bought the house on eBay for $150,000. Jones used revenue from his business, The Red Rider Leg Lamp Company, which manufactures replicas of the “major award” Ralphie’s father won in the film, for the down payment. The previous owners had reconfigured the building into a duplex, installed modern windows, and covered the original wood siding with blue vinyl. Watching the movie frame by frame, Jones drew detailed plans of the interiors — which had been filmed on a Toronto sound stage — and spent $240,000 to gut the structure, reconfigure it to a single-family dwelling, transform it into a near-replica of the movie set, and restore the exterior to its appearance in the film.”

Written by Mark

November 30, 2008 at 8:31 PM

Not my idea of “Christmas spirit”

with one comment

Written by Mark

November 28, 2008 at 4:19 PM

Posted in Christmas

Spreading cheer

without comments

William Lederer tells an unforgettable Christmas story.

Written by Mark

December 17, 2006 at 4:14 PM

Posted in Christmas

A holiday wish based on your political affiliation

without comments

Got this via e-mail, and thought it was too clever not to post.

For my Democrat readers:

Please accept with no obligation, implied or implicit, our best wishes for an environmentally conscious, socially responsible, low-stress, non-addictive, gender-neutral celebration of the winter solstice holiday, practiced within the most enjoyable traditions of the religious persuasion of your choice, or secular practices of your choice, with respect for the religious/secular persuasion and/or traditions of others, or their choice not to practice religious or secular traditions at all. We also wish you a fiscally successful, personally fulfilling and medically uncomplicated recognition of the generally accepted calendar year 2007, but not without due respect for the calendars of choice of other cultures whose contributions to society have helped make America great. Not to imply that America is necessarily greater than any other country nor the only America in the Western Hemisphere, and without regard to the race, creed, color, age, physical ability, religious faith or sexual preference of the wishes. By accepting these greetings you are accepting these terms. This greeting is subject to clarification or withdrawal. It is freely transferable with no alteration to the original greeting. It implies no promise by the wisher to actually implement any of the wishes for herself or himself or others, and is void where prohibited by law and is revocable at the sole discretion of the wisher. This wish is warranted to perform as expected within the usual application of good tidings for a period of one year or until the issuance of a subsequent holiday greeting, whichever comes first, and warranty is limited to replacement of this wish or issuance of a new wish at the sole discretion of the wisher.

For my Republican readers:

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!

Written by Mark

December 16, 2006 at 9:54 PM

Posted in Christmas, Humor

Twilight zone

without comments

The Fellowship of Christian Athletes is sponsoring screenings of The Nativity Story at two public high schools in Fairfax County, Virginia, and civil libertarians have not come unglued.

Written by Mark

November 30, 2006 at 4:04 PM

Unpublished column on churches closing for Christmas

without comments

I was all set to pen my annual “Grinch List,” where I chastise various companies, schools, governments, and civil libertarians for their hostility toward all things Christmas.

Then I came across something that offended me more than Target’s stubborn adherence to the politically correct “Happy Holidays,” more than schools that ban Christmas songs mentioning Christ, even more than the busybodies who roam the countryside looking for Nativity scenes to shut down. Instead, this year’s irritants are churches that aren’t opening their doors on Christmas Day.

On December 7, for example, FoxNews.com ran the headline “Some Megachurches to Close on Christmas.” One spokeswoman for Willow Creek Community Church in South Barrington, Illinois, told FoxNews that church leaders there have decided that holding services on a Christmas Sunday would not be the most effective use of staff and volunteer resources. The last time Christmas fell on a Sunday was 1994, and only a small number of people showed up.

“If our target and our mission is to reach the unchurched, basically the people who don’t go to church, how likely is it that they’ll be going to church on Christmas morning?” she said.

I guess that chance is zero if the doors are closed.

Christ Fellowship Church in Palm Beach County, Florida will also not be holding worship services on Christmas Day.

Yes, on the day we celebrate the birth of Christ, which falls on a Sunday this year, Christ Fellowship will close its doors to give members more time to spend with their families. Pastor Todd Mullins said that Christmas — Sunday or not — is set aside for family time, and “Christ Fellowship is all about supporting the family.”

I’m all for supporting the family, too, believe me, but Scripture calls on believers to prioritize Christ above all, including the family. So you just open the presents, get dressed, pack up the family and head to church, the way we do every Sunday. We can celebrate Christmas at home, for sure, but we can really jazz it up at church.

Still, Mullins did say there will be thirteen services in observance of Christmas in the two days prior to December 25, the philosophy being that people will hear the word, take it home and talk about the Christmas story at home with family. “We have the best of both worlds. We will be celebrating that together as a church family the evening before then allowing them to celebrate at home on Sunday morning.”

At a time when Christmas is being steamrolled by political correctness and lost in materialism and selfishness, Christian churches that do not hold services when Christmas Day falls on Sunday are allowing themselves to be led by our culture.

In his letter to the Romans, the apostle Paul instructed the faithful to “be not conformed to this world.” Yet churches that close on December 25 are doing just that: conforming to a world in which Christmas has far greater secular meaning than spiritual.

Most of us indulge ourselves and our families during the Christmas season. But celebrating the day of Christ’s birth also demands that we think outside ourselves. The best way we can honor Christ is to put away at least some of our selfishness and dedicate ourselves to our fellow man and to Christ.

Christians who complain about the secular attack on the second-most important day on the Christian calendar, but don’t open their churches when Christmas falls on a Sunday, really don’t have an argument against those who trash Christmas. If the genuine spirit of Christmas is to be maintained, then don’t look to Target or the ACLU to make the first overtures. The place to start is in the churches of those who call themselves “Christ-centered” to ensure that we aren’t conforming to this world, but to a world that is greater than ours.

Written by Mark

December 22, 2005 at 4:58 PM

Herod, the original Grinch

without comments

My pastor at the First Baptist Church of Mt. Juliet made a point this morning about the hostility toward Christmas that I’d never before considered. What we’re seeing today isn’t new. Indeed, there is a concerted bias secularists show toward Christmas — not Kwanzaa or Hanukkah or even the “holiday season,” but Christmas. But it’s not the first time.

King Herod back in Matthew became the first “Grinch” owing to his insecurities about the new king that had just been born. Just as he could not accept the majesty of the Christ-child, so too are secularists and those hostile to the Christian faith unable to accept the majesty of the Christ-child today.

After Jesus was born in Bethlehem in Judea, during the time of King Herod, Magi from the east came to Jerusalem and asked, “Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews? We saw his star in the east and have come to worship him.” When King Herod heard this he was disturbed, and all Jerusalem with him. When he had called together all the people’s chief priests and teachers of the law, he asked them where the Christ was to be born. “In Bethlehem in Judea,” they replied, “for this is what the prophet has written: ‘But you, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, are by no means least among the rulers of Judah; for out of you will come a ruler who will be the shepherd of my people Israel.’” Then Herod called the Magi secretly and found out from them the exact time the star had appeared. He sent them to Bethlehem and said, “Go and make a careful search for the child. As soon as you find him, report to me, so that I too may go and worship him.” After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh. And having been warned in a dream not to go back to Herod, they returned to their country by another route. When they had gone, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. “Get up,” he said, “take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.” So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: “Out of Egypt I called my son.” When Herod realized that he had been outwitted by the Magi, he was furious, and he gave orders to kill all the boys in Bethlehem and its vicinity who were two years old and under, in accordance with the time he had learned from the Magi. (Matthew 2:1-16, NIV)

Written by Mark

December 18, 2005 at 3:50 PM

Posted in Christianity, Christmas

Tagged with

The $64,000 question

without comments

Donald and Nina Young ask the rather pointed question “Is Christmas about Jesus Christ and His Work or is it really about Satan the devil and all of his work?”

Christmas and its season, creates or generates a false spirit of a seasonal joy and a seasonal happiness that dries up shortly after Christmas is over. People get more depressed at this season than at any other time of the year. There is more use of alcohol and other drugs that sedate the mind and brain at the Christmas season than at any other time. And Christmas and its spirit to people is like one of today’s drugs, that gives them a temporary high, but a terrible let down and depression later. Why is Christmas this way? It is all because Christmas and all of its doings is not the work of the true Spirit of Jesus Christ, but a lying, fake spirit of Satan, the devil, that inspires its participants to get involved with all the make believe love, deception of a seasonal joy and a temporal happiness. This is what keeping Christmas and its customs creates in all of its participants.

The Youngs make many valid points in their essay. But I would argue that Christmas is what the individual makes of it. The work of Christ can still be accomplished in the name of Christmas as long as one’s eyes are on Christ and not on store windows.

Written by Mark

November 26, 2005 at 6:05 PM

Posted in Christianity, Christmas

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Conservative Christmas present ideas”

without comments

It’s November now, and with department stores locked and loaded for the Christmas shopping season, I’ve decided to pen my first-ever column on gift ideas for that special conservative in your life.

The hottest gift idea this year is undoubtedly the Club G’itmo line of apparel available at rushlimbaugh.com. My favorite is a t-shirt that reads “My Mullah went to Club G’itmo and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt.” It comes in Institutional Orange only. If you really want that special conservative to get his jollies, have him wear his new shirt to Carthage and take his picture in front of the Gore-Lieberman Store.

If that special conservative happens to be into bumper stickers, you can head over to protestwarrior.com and order one that reads “The ACLU. We don’t hate religion. We just hate Christianity!” There’s another one that goes “SAY NO TO WAR! UNLESS A DEMOCRAT IS PRESIDENT….” These are great stocking stuffers.

For book ideas, there’s always “The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History” by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. (By the way, politically incorrect history is just history with God left in it.) Other book ideas include “How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must)” by Ann Coulter, “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder” by Michael Savage, “Unhinged: Exposing Liberals Gone Wild” by Michelle Malkin, “Tax Revolt” by Phil Valentine, and anything by Thomas Sowell. For the budding young conservative, there’s the children’s book “Help! Mom! There Are Liberals Under My Bed!” by Katharine DeBrecht.

While on books, that special conservative might benefit from one of Dave Ramsey’s publications. Dave shows how even those living on modest incomes can become financially independent and well-off by retirement. Good retirement planning will sever one from the strings of Social Security, which is bad for the Democratic Party. A definite winner.

For the music lover, any compilation CD by Charlie Daniels will surely be appreciated. Nearly every song is dripping with political incorrectness. Daniels is openly pro-God, pro-America, pro-gun, and pro-South. Make sure Charlie’s tribute to Red Skelton’s “Pledge of Allegiance” is one of the tracks, where Daniels actually has the gall to include the phrase “under God.” The special conservative in your life will relish driving by his local Peace and Justice Center with the windows rolled down and “This Ain’t No Rag, It’s A Flag” playing at top volume.

How about a Ten Commandments wall hanging? The Ten Commandments are always a good thing to have around, and this will be one religious marking the ACLU can’t challenge.

If that special conservative is into investing, a share of Halliburton stock would make another great stocking stuffer.

He might also appreciate a voucher for a free tank of gas. Believe it or not, conservatives tend not to mind the high gas prices as much as non-conservatives. We know Bush and Cheney’s rich oil buddies are raking in obscene profits right now, and getting gouged at the pump is our way of making belated campaign contributions.

Anything of, by, or about Ronald Reagan would be a special treat for that special conservative in your life.

For $35, you can buy your conservative a one-year membership to the National Rifle Association. It comes with a magazine subscription.

For $12, you can by a “Choose Life” front plate from Tennessee Right to Life.

A Starbucks gift card would be nice. Great coffee, great pastries, and the place is often crawling with liberals. It would be an ideal place for the special conservative in your life to try out his new Club G’itmo tee-shirt, with a copy of “Tax Revolt” tucked under his arm for good measure.

If your conservative carnivore likes to grill, buy him a nice charcoal model — not gas. Burning charcoal will put more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and thereby increase his contribution to global warming.

And you can always buy that special conservative a subscription to the Lebanon Democrat. If he asks you “Why in the world would I read a newspaper that has the word ‘Democrat’ as part of its name?” you can respond “Well, they’ve got this goon named Mark Rose who writes right-wing editorials once or twice a week. He’s a Neanderthal. I think you’ll like him.”

Written by Mark

November 9, 2005 at 8:31 PM

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “This year’s top grinches”

without comments

Christmas appears to be another word the left has come to find deeply offensive. Now is the time of year not just for joy for those who find a deeper meaning in Christmas than lights, presents, trees, and egg nog, but also the time when the easily-offended spread their gloom by trying to expunge Christ from our holiday vocabulary.

For example, the Freedom from Religion Foundation, a group of “non-theists” — the politically correct word for “atheists” — in Wisconsin have posted a “Winter Solstice” sign in front of the State Capitol that reads “At this season of the Winter Solstice may reason prevail. There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and superstition that hardens hearts and enslaves minds.”

The back of the sign reads, “State/Church: Keep Them Separate.” Ironically, a taped-on caveat reminds readers, “Thou shalt not steal.”

In the South Orange/Maplewood School District in New Jersey, the forty-member Columbia High School brass ensemble will be, for the first time, limited to musical numbers such as “Winter Wonderland” and “Frosty the Snowman.”

Superintendent Peter P. Horoschak explained “Rather than try to respond to all the various religions and try to balance them, it’s best to stay away from that and simply have a nonreligious tone to them and have more of a seasonal tone.”

At Lake Washington High School in Kirkland, Washington, even Ebenezer Scrooge is no match for political correctness. The Charles Dickens classic “A Christmas Carol” has been banned from showing there because it would have prompted a “secondary discussion about public school and religion,” says the principal, Mark Robertson. He uses the absurd reasoning that “Teaching about religious holidays is permissible, but celebrating them is not.” Indeed, we certainly don’t want students having secondary discussions about public school and religion.

Meanwhile, the superintendent over Lakehoma Elementary School in Mustang, Oklahoma has banned a nativity scene and the song “Silent Night” from a school play, citing fears that non-Christians might be offended and file suit against the school.

Superintendent Karl Springer said “I just could not break the law. We may have sins of omission occasionally, but we won’t have sins of commission. If I know about something that I believe to be against the law, [then] we will take action on it.”

Brent Olsson, an attorney affiliated with the Alliance Defense Fund, retorted “Including Christmas in the play does not violate any law. It is a myth that the so-called ’separation of church and state’ requires officials to suppress the celebration of Christmas in the public schools.” Olsson further noted that “Ninety-six percent of Americans celebrate Christmas. If the superintendent is truly concerned about offending someone, then he just made a very wrong decision.”

However, this year’s top Grinches are undoubtedly the organizers of Denver’s Parade of Lights. A Christian group is not allowed to participate in the city’s parade this year, because church members planned to sing Christmas hymns and proclaim a “Merry Christmas” message on their float.

So what is acceptable? Santa Claus gets a pass, along with gingerbread houses, toy soldiers, and an “international procession to celebrate the cultural and ethnic diversity of the region” (to include everyone except Christians, of course).

The Two Spirit Society of Denver, which is a support group for American Indians who are homosexual, bisexual, or transgendered, will be honored as “holy people.” Performers of the Lion Dance, a Chinese New Year tradition “meant to chase away evil spirits and welcome good luck and good fortune for the year,” will also parade.

So, although pagan worshippers are allowed to participate, parade spokesman Michael Krikorian said the event does not allow “direct religious themes.” Krikorian reasons “We want to avoid that specific religious message out of respect for other religions in the region. It could be construed as disrespectful to other people who enjoy a parade each year.”

You’d think by the reaction of this year’s Grinches that those of us who believe in the Christ-centered celebration of Christmas are a dying breed. Yet a recently-taken Newsweek poll found that 93% of all Americans believe Jesus Christ really lived, and 82% believe Christ is the Son of God. Nearly 80% believe Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit and born of the Virgin Mary, and 67% believe the entire story of Christmas, including the shepherds, the Star of Bethlehem, the angels, and the wise men.

There is one heartwarming story to conclude this year’s Grinch roundup, however. It comes from our nation’s capitol, where the conservative group Public Advocate of the United States, “not dissuaded from ‘bah, humbugs’ to groups like the Boy Scouts of America and pro-family Americans in general,” sang traditional religious Christmas carols in front of the Washington office of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The Christian Wire Service reported that even a few ACLU staffers joined in, proving that Christmas, when celebrated as it was originally intended — to mark the birth of Jesus Christ — can overcome even the hardest of hearts.

Written by Mark

December 16, 2004 at 12:00 PM

Today’s Lebanon Democrat column: “Christmas is losing ‘Christ’”

without comments

“In those days Caesar Augustus issued a decree that a census should be taken of the entire Roman world. (This was the first census that took place while Quirinius was governor of Syria.) And everyone went to his own town to register. So Joseph also went up from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to Bethlehem the town of David, because he belonged to the house and line of David. He went there to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. While they were there, the time came for the baby to be born, and she gave birth to her firstborn, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn.” (Luke 2:1-7, NIV)

This is the traditional meaning of Christmas, the celebration of the birth of Jesus Christ (hence the “Christ” in “Christmas”).

But not everyone shares our joy of Christmas. To illustrate, I have assembled a small inventory of Christmas spoilers, those who spread holiday misery and bad tidings to all.

The principal of an elementary school in Sacramento County, California has prohibited teachers from uttering the word “Christmas” in class or in written materials. In Madison, Wisconsin, atheists have posted a winter solstice sign at the Capitol, declaring that “Christians stole Christmas” from ancient pagans. (Source: Joe Kovacs, “Christmas in America becomes battleground,” WorldNetDaily.com, 12/14/03.)

All Saints Church in High Wycombe, England has been told that it cannot publicize its Christmas services on a community notice board in order to avoid offending other religions. The Buckinghamshire County Council upheld the ban, noting the church represents a “religious preference group.” (Source: Stewart Payne, “The day that Christmas carols fell foul of the PC brigade,” Telegraph, 12/12/03.)

Music teacher Mark Denison of Clover Creek Elementary School in Bethel, Washington, substituted the word “Christmas” with the word “winter” in a carol to be sung at a school program so as not to appear to be favoring one faith over another. (A Hanukkah song that mentiones the “mighty miracle” of Israel’s ancient days will be included in the program, however). And in New Jersey, one school board eliminated all religious music from school programs. (Source: “Taking ‘Christmas’ Out of Holiday Jingles,” FOXNews.com, 12/12/03.)

In Baldwin, Kansas, the nation’s top Grinch, the ACLU, has successfelly halted Santa’s sleigh from visiting public schools there, because of “improper religious activities occurring in the district.” It seems that last year Santa asked students why Christmas is celebrated. “In every school, one or more children would pop up and say Jesus’ birthday,” stated the school superintendent. (Source: Kristen Dymacek, “School board examines ACLU allegations,” Baldwin City Signal, 12/10/03.)

A middle school in New York has decorated a tree with ornaments celebrating the world’s cultural, ethnic, and religious differences. But it’s not a Christmas tree, says teacher Debbie Smith. It’s a “diversity tree.” (Source: Scott Norvell, “Successfully Stopping Santa and A-Caroling We Won’t Go,” FOXNews.com, 12/15/03.)

In New York City, the public school “Holiday Displays” policy prohibits the display of Christian Nativity scenes during the Christmas season, while permitting and encouraging the display of the Jewish Menorah and the Islamic Star and Crescent during certain religious holidays and observances. (Source: Jon Dougherty, “Ban on Christmas leads to court fight,” WorldNetDaily.com, 12/10/03.)

Not surprisingly, a study recently conducted by Britain’s University of Warwick has concluded that “Religious people are happier than those without spirituality in their life.” And those who keep their religious practices intact during Christmastime are happier than those who rely on the pleasures of shopping for their holiday meaning. (Source: Jennifer Harper, “Religion leads to a merrier Christmas,” The Washington Times, 12/11/03.)

Project director and psychologist Stephen Joseph noted that “Religious people seem to have a greater purpose in life, which is why they are happier. Looking at the research evidence, it seems those who celebrate the Christian meaning of Christmas are, on the whole, likely to be happier. The research shows that too much materialism in our lives can be terrible for happiness.”

Leave it to the politically correct, anti-Christian zealots in our society to attempt to steal the joy of Christmas from those of us who celebrate the holiday for its religious meaning. It’s easy to have contempt for the Grinches and Scrooges, but then it’s hard not to feel sorry for them, too. After all, the birth of Jesus Christ is, for those who believe, the primary source of Christmas joy — not the decorations and festivities.

The way I see it, if anti-Christians want their joyless holiday without the “Christ,” then they can have it. This is a free country, after all. (But may their chestnuts roast a little too long, and scorch.) Really, what does banning Nativity scenes, religious music, Santa Claus, and the word “Christmas” actually accomplish other than to further someone’s political agenda? Indeed, the Scrooges of the world can keep their holiday misery to themselves. In the meantime, Merry Christmas to all.

Written by Mark

December 18, 2003 at 12:00 PM